.png)
In Defence of Pazuzu: How The Exorcist Threw a Mesopotamian Demon King Under the Bus
If you know the name Pazuzu, chances are it invokes images of spinning heads and pea soup. Thanks to 1973’s The Exorcist, Pazuzu has become pop culture shorthand for pure evil. Which is unfortunate, because in ancient Mesopotamia, Pazuzu was not the villain of the story. He was the gruff anti-hero who got the job done.
It Takes a Monster to Fight a Monster
Pazuzu appears in Assyrian and Babylonian sources from the first millennium BCE as a powerful wind spirit, specifically associated with the hot, dry winds of the southwest, which in modern Arabic is referred to as khamsin. He is a demon, in fact, the king of the wind demons, but that doesn’t mean he was always malevolent.
In Mesopotamia, demons were divine free agents, capable of both good and bad acts. The khamsin of Pazuzu could destroy crops and bring on sandstorms. Yet it could also banish the pestilential simoom (poisoned wind) blowing up from the Underworld whenever Lamashtu got out. The god Enlil’s gentle and cooling saba wind from the east couldn’t defeat Lamashtu. It took a monster to fight a monster.
He certainly looked monstrous. He has a head somewhere between a lion's and a dog's, with giant searching eyes. He’s winged, taloned, and has a snake’s head for a penis. Divinity, however, didn’t need to be approachable in the ancient world. Seraphim in the Bible are fiery winged serpents with eyes covering their bodies, kitted out with human hands, feet, and heads. Pazuzu is no more monstrously formed than the Seraphim or Anubis.
He was ugly and capable of evil, but still, pregnant women invited this dangerous figure into their homes, hung amulets invoking him over their beds, and wore his image around their necks to ward off far worse entities.
The Daughter of Heaven & The King of the Air
Chief among those was Lamashtu, a fearsome demoness who fed on the blood of infants and was associated with the simoom and miasma. In a time when infant mortality was high, Lamashtu was the personification of every mother’s fear, and there were few houses the demoness didn’t eventually visit. We see this fear displayed in the following incantation against her:
Great is the daughter of Heaven who tortures babies Her hand is a net, her embrace is death She is cruel, raging, angry, predatory A runner, a thief is the daughter of Heaven She touches the bellies of women in labour She pulls out the pregnant women's baby The daughter of Heaven is one of the Gods, her brothers With no child of her own Her head is a lion's head Her body is a donkey's body She roars like a lion She constantly howls like a demon-dog
(Keel, Othmar, Die Welt der altorientalischen Bildsymbolik und das AT, 1980, Abb. 94, S. 71.)
Pazuzu was believed to repel this fearsome creature, not through gentle persuasion or divine goodness, but by being more terrifying and powerful than her. This is a recurring theme in Mesopotamian religion: you fight chaos with slightly more controlled chaos. Pazuzu wasn’t good in a moral sense; he was useful. He was a necessary force in a dangerous world. In some versions of the myth, Pazuzu is Lamashtu's estranged husband, further reinforcing his dominant position over her. His long-standing personal beef with Lamashtu could be used to humanity’s advantage.
Pazuzu was, above all, however, an air spirit. He governed wind, breath, atmospheric forces, and yes, even scent, particularly malodours. He was the king of all things invisible, ethereal, and potentially lethal. In Mesopotamian thought, air was not neutral. Breath was life, yes, but that same air could carry disease or divine punishment. So, in Mesopotamian theology, scent became a way of discovering the intentions of the wind. Olfaction was a legitimate methodology to revealed knowledge. Was the breeze bringing the dry staleness of Pazuzu or the blistering rot of Lamashtu? It was imperative your nose knew what was coming. Pazuzu truly embodied the double nature of air: life-giving and destructive.
A Dark Ally in an Even Darker World
While The Exorcist is celebrated for its groundbreaking portrayal of religious horror, it is also here that the film does Pazuzu dirty. By flattening him into a one-note embodiment of Catholic evil, the film strips away the cultural context that made him so meaningful. Ancient people understood that unseen forces such as air, breath, and scent shape human life in ways we cannot fully control. Modernity is built on an absolute rejection of the unseen and an obsession with control.
In essence, the film is a study in juxtaposition between the modern ego and an ancient, unseen world it is ill-equipped to face. This was a huge missed opportunity to explore these concepts through the morally grey ethereal mythology of Pazuzu. The Pazuzu of the novels and movies has no real motivations for what he does beyond being evil for evil’s sake, but mythological Pazuzu had temperaments and moods, just like the wind. Pazuzu personified the anxiety between the unseen and the seen, but he could also be persuaded to side with us. The fear of the unknown and unknowable could be navigated. Back when I was a practising attorney, I used to tell my clients, “I’m an asshole... but I’m YOUR asshole.” Pazuzu was OUR cosmic asshole serving as a mediator between chaos and order.
His malevolent appearance belies a far more complex social function that the film could have explored through a postmodern lens. The movie keeps the demon king's aesthetics but discards his grey theology for fun, cheap thrills. By reducing him to a symbol of malevolence, Pazuzu becomes a divine hitman demoted from battling elder gods to tormenting suburban tweens.
So next time you see Pazuzu depicted as unspeakable evil, remember he was once a dark ally in an even darker world, and sometimes you need a demon to fight worse demons.
Comments