.png)
Aphrodite, Perfume, & the Theology of Sensuality
- Nuri@Atropos
- Jan 16
- 14 min read
Updated: 7 days ago
In the ancient Mediterranean, perfume was not merely a cosmetic. It was also a substance with the potential to mediate between human bodies and divine presences. Long before it became a personal care item, manufactured aromatics were part of the aesthetics of power for the twin pillars of the ancient Mediterranean world: The Temple and The Palace. Within the Temple's aesthetics of power, fragrance marked the transition between the profane and the sacred, as well as communion with the ethereal. While all ancient religions of the region used aromatics, the transformative power of scent was most fully expressed in the cult of Aphrodite. There, odours could connect worshippers to their deepest epithymia (desires of the soul, both carnal and holy) as well as inspire the greatest thumos (spiritual and emotional passion).
In the context of Aphrodite worship, perfumes became more than olfactory staging for rituals; they became a mode of prayer within a theology of sensuality. This sensual theology resisted the growing schism between the mind and the body in male-dominated spheres of thought and, instead, offered an embodied and integrated religious experience that resonated with women.
Mighty Aphrodite
Goddess of love and beauty, Aphrodite was the personification of the generative forces of nature. Known to the Romans as Venus, the Greek Aphrodite was herself a late addition to the Hellenistic pantheon. Her worship evolved out of the Greek Dark Age, when a chthonic fertility deity in Cyprus synchronised with the Phoenician goddess Astarte. Astarte was the Western Semitic form of the Assyrian/Babylonian goddess of love and war, Ishtar, who was, herself, a cognate of the Sumerian goddess Inanna. While Ishtar/Inanna personified nature’s generative and destructive forces, Aphrodite inherited mostly the love side of the equation, with many of Ishtar’s war-like qualities going to Aphrodite’s lover, Ares. There is evidence that her early worship on Cyprus included these combative elements, but they withered as her worship spread to mainland Greece. However, vestiges could be seen in classical Sparta, where she was given the epithet Areia (warlike).
Even wearing only one of Ishtar’s shoes, Aphrodite occupied a unique space in the Hellenic imagination. At a time when women's roles were largely confined to domestic and familial spheres, Aphrodite's liminal position offered a subversive model of feminine power. She had the autonomy of the virgin goddesses, yet was far from chaste. She possessed the queenly splendour of the mother goddesses, though no one would call Aphrodite an ideal mother. Her favour was essential in conceiving a baby, yet she left the messiness of childbirth to Eileithyia, Hera, or even the virgin Artemis. She blessed marriages, but was herself incapable of the fidelity expected of Greek women.
We see this duality reflected in her many epithets, the most prominent being the contradictory Aphrodite Urania (Heavenly Aphrodite) and Aphrodite Pandemos (Common Aphrodite). Plato, in his Symposium, sees Urania as inspiring the spiritually pure love between men on which Greek society was built (in other words, intellectually generative love). Meanwhile, Plato considered Pandemos as fostering the purely physical desire between men and women, necessary for procreation (materially generative love) [1].
Even among the gods, Aphrodite was a force of nature, capable of holding sway even over Zeus. She was the female form of creation itself, both mercurial and loving, profane and sacred. Aphrodite is less a distinct character and more a human impulse to define the divine feminine. This divine feminine was venerated as Inanna, as early as the Uruk period (c. 4000–3100 BCE). Aphrodite worship persisted until the widespread persecution of pagan cults in the 3rd and 4th Centuries CE. Though individual holdouts might have continued to worship her in private until the 5th Century CE, well after the rest of the pantheon had fallen [2]. We even see parallels with the goddess in the veneration of the Virgin Mary, who is titled The Queen of Heaven, a title that Inanna and Ishtar also held in Mesopotamian religion [3]. That is not by chance. Mary is also a female form through which the material and spiritual worlds merge.
To the modern mind, being the goddess of love, beauty, and procreation seems nichely feminine compared to the lords of war and industry like her partners Ares and Hephaestus. The ancients, however, understood that those gods were doing it all for her. Love, beauty, sex, and children were what kept the cosmos spinning. Aphrodite was the generative counterbalance to humanity's destructive impulse; love and war, life and death, in a constant dance fuelled by desire.
Sex Ethics & The Evolution of the Cult of Aphrodite
While there is a direct cultural heredity from Inanna to Aphrodite, these goddesses’ cults were not identical and reflected the sexual norms of their times and communities. For instance, the cults of Inanna, Ishtar, and Astarte participated in hieros gamos (sacred marriage) rituals. In these rituals, a priestess embodied the goddess and engaged in sexual acts with the king, representing the goddess’s consort Dumuzid. The consummation of this sacred marriage ensured prosperity and fertility in the land. This was not part of Aphrodite worship, even though the Greek pantheon did have a cognate for Dumuzid, Adonis. However, scholars have debated the existence of hieros gamos in the Demeter cult [4].
Inanna and Aphrodite were also patron deities of prostitutes, but neither was presented as a sex worker. Meanwhile, the Akkadian erotic hymn, Ishtar Never Tires, graphically details Ishtar having sex with all the men of a city, and still not being satisfied [5]. In other hymns, she is a bawdy brothel worker leaning out the window with exposed breasts, calling to the men to come make love to her [6].
These hymns are reflected in the popular art motif known as The Woman at the Window in Mesopotamian and Phoenician art. In it, the face of an elegantly dressed woman, either a goddess or a priestess, peers from a palace window. In early versions of this art, the woman wears an X-marked frontlet, fastened around her head with a cord, which is theorised to symbolise her role as a temple prostitute [7]. This may have reflected real-life situations where temple sex workers called to men from the window as Ishtar did in the hymn [8]. This wasn’t just to lure men into carnal acts. Sex was a cosmically generative rite. These relations honoured the goddess and increased the fecundity of the land and its people. It was a ritualistic counterbalance to war and famine.
Later Phoenician versions depict the goddess Astarte at the window. While there was no longer the direct connection to ritual sex, it was implied, nonetheless. The Astarte cult practised hieros gamos and sacred prostitution at different points in her worship. Aphrodite inherited this association with the motif in her Cypriotic worship as Aphrodite Parakyptousa. Yet the image's meaning changed in Cyprus. Parakyptousa can mean both she who leans over and she who looks out. These ivory plaques evoke a scene of Aphrodite bending out her window, looking down at you, a potential lover in her garden.
Whether or not Aphrodite had temple prostitutes is hotly debated in academia. The claims of temple prostitution made by Strabo and Herodotus appear to be more an anti-Corinthian smear campaign than an authentic history [9]. There is no current archaeological or epigraphic evidence to support institutionalised ritual sex for Aphrodite in Greece. The absence of such findings doesn’t completely prove there wasn’t ritual sex for Aphrodite, but given the dearth of evidence and the rigour of the investigation, it seems unlikely.
This dramatically changes the narrative for Aphrodite Parakyptousa. She is no longer a sex worker calling you into a temple to have consecrated (and most likely public) sex. She is Aphrodite as a literal domestic goddess. The space on the other side of the window isn’t an altar, it's a bedroom. Yet, the connection to ritual sex still remains. The new narrative conveyed was that the magical powers of sex-as-a-mechanism-of-cosmic-order could be found in one’s own bed. The personal was a microcosm reflective of the cosmic. The love one creates in their own home can help heal the world. While Plato saw Heavenly Aphrodite and Common Aphrodite as completely separate deities, Aphrodite Parakyptousa challenges that position. She is both heavenly and common. Interestingly, Aphrodite Parakyptousa was popular with women, while this Platonic desire to divide the mind from the body seemed to be most popular with men.
Aphrodite had to navigate a distinctly different sexual terrain than Ishtar, one in which men held, at times, an adversarial position to the women in their lives. Misogyny and patriarchy existed in ancient Mesopotamia as well, but they didn’t seem to institutionally hate their women quite as much as ancient Greece did. As Seitkasimova so elegantly states, women were not seen as human but as “species-extending beings”; thus, because they lacked personhood, they could not be expected to have human or civil rights [10]. The goddess in charge of navigating romantic liaisons in that world had a very different challenge from the one that mocked a whole city for not giving her enough orgasms.
The Theology of Sensuality
By the Classical period, Greek philosophical thought increasingly privileged the intellect over the body. From Pythagorean dualism to Platonic metaphysics, the senses were framed as unreliable intermediaries between the soul and truth. Plato famously warns in Phaedo that every experience of the sensory "is a sort of nail which nails and rivets the soul to the body, until she becomes like the body, and believes that to be true which the body affirms to be true; and from agreeing with the body and having the same delights she is obliged to have the same habits and haunts, and is not likely ever to be pure at her departure to the world below, but is always infected by the body; and so she sinks into another body and there germinates and grows, and has therefore no part in the communion of the divine and pure and simple." [11]. At the same time, Aristotle ranked nous (intellect) far above aisthesis (perception) as the highest human faculty, connecting it directly to the divine [12]. This intellectual hierarchy was not gender-neutral. Rational abstraction became coded as masculine, while embodiment and sensory knowledge were increasingly feminised and devalued. This created an intellectual sphere in which men excluded women, physically, sensorily, and intellectually.
Few women could rise in those circles, and the ones who did were hyper elite. The average woman in ancient Greece could not access truth and divinity through elite philosophy, but through theology. Instead of rejecting aisthesis, they created an alternative worldview. Greek philosophers often presented their work as an intellectual alternative to the barbarity of superstition. I posit that the Aphrodite cult was in dialogue with these movements and offered an alternative form of cognition, a sensual theology. Unlike hedonism, which seeks pleasure as the highest good, or mystic unions, which aim to transcend the physical, sensual theology integrates both intellect and affective experience. It regards the senses as vital pathways to divine understanding and highlights embodied experience as central to religious life.
The cult of Aphrodite's sensual theology also stood apart from other Greek and Mediterranean religious practices, such as the ascetic traditions of the Orphic and Pythagorean cults. These ideologies embraced austerity and the forgoing of sensual pleasures to attain spiritual purity. In contrast, Aphrodite's worship embraced sensual experience as divine, positioning it as a means of communion with the sacred. While the Orphic tradition focused on the soul's journey beyond the physical realm, Aphrodite's cult celebrated the present physical existence as a conduit to the divine, offering a broader, more inclusive approach to understanding the nature of divinity.
Pleasure, however, was but one sensation in an anxiety-riddled world that women desperately needed to understand. As Pomeroy observes in Goddesses, Whores, Wives, and Slaves: Women in Classical Antiquity, women in ancient Greece often participated in religious practices that intersected with the major uncertainties of their lives, including sexuality, fertility, marriage, and death [13]. These were precisely the domains over which women had the least civic control and the greatest existential stakes. I do not think it is a coincidence that these concerns overlap with Aphrodite’s domain.
Embodying the Goddess
Rather than aspiring to transcend the body, Aphrodite worship embraced the body as a locus of meaning. Evidence from Paphos indicates that worshippers engaged in embodied practices, such as bathing and anointing the body with perfumed oils. These acts were also performed as devotions to the goddess's statues. These were not mere cosmetic acts but religious rites that physically involved the body in devotion and revelation [14]. One was to embody and commune with the goddess while bathing in her pools. These sensory-rich practices highlighted the body as a site of divine encounter rather than a hindrance to it.
The annual Aphrodisia festival celebrated Aphrodite through processions, music, incense, anointings, flowers, and food. Participants engaged in collective embodied acts such as walking in procession, singing, offering incense, anointing each other, cooking pigs, and offering flowers [15]. As the rhythmic beat of drums reverberated through the air, the sweet, earthy scent of burning myrrh mingled with the fragrant blooms carried by the worshippers and the savoury scent of roasted pork. These acts invoked sight, sound, smell, taste, and touch as elements of devotion and communion [16]. These rituals involved expressive, female-centric communal engagement with the senses, bringing worshippers into contact with the goddess’s domain of love and fertility. While not exactly ritual sex, these embodied acts served a similar cultic function of creating cosmic feminine and generative powers to offset the forces of atrophy.
Likewise, the Adonia (a women-only celebration in honour of Aphrodite’s mourning for Adonis) was marked by bodily expressions in the search for truth. These acts included dance, lamentation, and rooftop ritual gatherings to cultivate ephemeral gardens. These rites centred on embodied mourning and sensory participation, emphasising women’s direct engagement with emotional and physical experience as part of religious life [17]. Again, women aligned their personal lives as microcosmic simulacrums of the larger cosmos. As Aphrodite mourned her lost love, so too did they mourn theirs. They sat, contemplating the meaning of existence, while tending a makeshift garden that would never take root and thus be doomed to die. Is this any less of a means to connect to the meaning of life than nous?
The Praxiteles statue of Aphrodite of Knidos was the first major cult statue of the goddess to depict her nude [18]. It reflects a theology in which divine beauty and the human body are inseparable. Worshippers did not abstract Aphrodite into a purely intellectual ideal; they physically saw and engaged with her sensual form in sanctuaries, blurring the boundary between divine and human bodies.
In this context, the personal sphere became a ritual microcosm. The household, the marriage bed, the adorned body, and the spaces dismissed as womanly and private were invested with cosmological significance. Scholars of Greek religion have long noted that ritual was not confined to temples but permeated daily life, especially for women [19]. Through Aphrodite, women cultivated an embodied epistemology in which the senses and desire were not obstacles to the sacred but its vehicles. This theology integrated epithymia and thumos (desire and spirited emotion) rather than subordinating them to reason.
As Sappho writes, “the most beautiful thing on earth is whatever one loves” [20]. Beauty here is not an abstract ideal but a lived, felt experience. Sensation became a means of apprehending the divine feminine, allowing women to engage the mystical through what their bodies could perceive. In a world where civic power was largely inaccessible, the senses offered a domain of agency, devotion, and meaning-making.
Cult of Perfume
Within this theological framework, perfume assumed extraordinary religious significance. Aphrodite was not merely associated with fragrance; she was constituted through it. The Homeric hymns and lyric poetry use vivid imagery to describe the goddess announcing herself by her odour. This is sometimes referred to as her odmê d’imeroessa (scent that excites desire). Such creative expressions may not entirely reflect historical cultic practices but instead serve to convey the profound connection between scent and the divine in the cultural imagination. For instance, Aphrodite adorns herself to seduce Anchises; she does so with an “ambrosial unguent such as the Graces love” that makes Anchises overcome with desire for her [21]. Aphrodite engages in a common domestic act, applying an aromatic cosmetic, but with a superhuman result. As Constance Classen argues, in historical societies smell functioned as a culturally significant sense that marked social presence and conveyed symbolic meanings. [22]. This was especially illustrative when the odours were associated with the superbodies of the gods. Mortal perfumes were not expected to have the same magical potency but instead to reflect the essence of how these aromatics were used in the myths.
Aromatic practices in Aphrodite worship were intimate and repetitive: anointing the body, perfuming hair, scenting garments, burning incense, and offering perfumed oils at her shrines. These acts were not ornamental but transformational. Perfume altered the body's state, warming the skin, heightening awareness, and inducing affective shifts. Through scent, worshippers cultivated thumos, the stirring of passion, courage, and emotional vitality, and awakened epithymia, the deep desires that animated both erotic longing and devotional yearning.
Cyprus, Aphrodite’s mythic birthplace, was central to these practices and to the emergence of industrial perfume production in the ancient Eastern Mediterranean. Archaeological evidence from sites such as Paphos and Kition reveals large-scale production of scented oils, including perfumery vessels, presses, and residue analysis indicating complex aromatic blends [23]. Cyprus’s position at the crossroads of Mycenaean, Levantine, and Egyptian trade networks made it well positioned to be a hub for aromatic raw materials.
Cyprus was known as a major centre of perfume production in antiquity. Yet, these perfumes were not only secular commodities divorced from cult. As Mark Bradley argues in Smell and the Ancient Senses, in the ancient world, perfumes and smells were not merely sensory experiences but carried social, religious, and cultural meanings tied to their material use and context. [26]. To wear the perfume from Aphrodite’s island was to participate in her economy of desire and devotion.
Conclusion
For women in particular, perfume offered a way to engage the divine feminine through the body itself. Anointing became a form of prayer enacted on the skin, a sensual technology for aligning the self with Aphrodite’s generative force. In this sense, the cult of perfume did not merely serve Aphrodite worship; it helped create it. The theology of sensuality required material media, and fragrance became its most eloquent expression.
Aphrodite’s cult reveals a religious world in which the senses and devotion were inseparable; where the body was not a hindrance to transcendence but its threshold. Through perfume and sensual ritual, women shaped a theology that integrated intellect and sensation, private life and cosmic order. In the fragrant wake of Aphrodite, the divine feminine was not contemplated abstractly from a distance; it was inhaled, worn, and lived.
Related Upcoming Lectures
Refrences
Plato. (1997). Symposium (A. Nehamas & P. Woodruff, Trans.). In J. M. Cooper (Ed.), Plato: Complete works (pp. 457–505). Hackett Publishing Company.
Herbert, L. Pagans and Christians in Late Antique Aphrodisias. Conversion to Christianity from Late Antiquity to the Modern Age: Considering the Process in Europe, Asia, and the Americas. https://umnlibraries.manifoldapp.org/read/conversion-to-christianity/section/45aea382-edb0-4d48-862e-8be27c88a169
Horn, S. H. (1969) “Foreign Gods in Ancient Egypt.” Oriental Institute Publications, no. 35, The University of Chicago Press, 1969, pp. 40–41
Avagianou. A (2021) Hieros Gamos in Ancient Greek Religion:The Human Aspect of a Sacralized Ritual Sacred Marriages. Penn State Univierity Press
Foster, B. R. (2005). Before the muses: An anthology of Akkadian literature (3rd ed.). CDL Press.
Black, J., Cunningham, G., Robson, E., & Zólyomi, G. (2004). The literature of ancient Sumer. Oxford University Press.
Yoon D. (2015). The “Woman in the Window” Motif In Iconography and the Question of the Hebrew Goddess. Korea Presbyterian Journal of Theology Vol. 47 No. 3 (9), 11-33
Bahrani, Z. (2001). Women of Babylon: Gender and representation in Mesopotamia. Routledge.
Budin, S. L. (2008). The myth of sacred prostitution in antiquity. Cambridge University Press.
Seitkasimova, A. (2019). Sex and gender in ancient Mesopotamia. Cambridge University Press.
Plato. (1997). Phaedo (G. M. A. Grube, Trans.). In J. M. Cooper (Ed.), Plato: Complete works (pp. 49–100). Hackett Publishing Company.
Aristotle. (1984). Metaphysics (W. D. Ross, Trans.). In J. Barnes (Ed.), The complete works of Aristotle (Vol. 2). Princeton University Press.
Pomeroy, S. B. (1995). Goddesses, whores, wives, and slaves: Women in classical antiquity (Rev. ed.). Schocken Books.
Karageorghis, V. (2005). Kypris: The Aphrodite of Cyprus. A. G. Leventis Foundation.
Detienne, M., & Vernant, J.-P. (1989). The cuisine of sacrifice. University of Chicago Press.
Burkert, W. (1985). Greek religion: Archaic and classical (J. Raffan, Trans.). Harvard University Press.
Detienne, M. (1977). The gardens of Adonis. Princeton University Press.
Stewart, A. (1997). Art, desire, and the body in ancient Greece. Cambridge University Press.
Burkert, W. (1987). Ancient mystery cults. Harvard University Press.
Sappho. (2014). Fragment 16. In A. Carson (Trans.), If not, winter: Fragments of Sappho. Vintage Books.
Homeric Hymns. (2003). Homeric Hymn to Aphrodite (M. L. West, Trans.). Harvard University Press.
Classen, C. (2012). The deepest sense: A cultural history of touch. University of Illinois Press.
Toumazou, M. K., Kardulias, P. N., & Counts, D. B. (Eds.). (2011). Cyprus and the Aegean in the Early Iron Age: The legacy of Nicolas Coldstream. Oxford University Press.
Theophrastus. (1916). On odours (A. Hort, Trans.). Harvard University Press.
Pliny the Elder. (1952). Natural history (Vol. 4, Books XII–XVI) (H. Rackham, Trans.). Harvard University Press.
Bradley, M. (2015). Smell and the ancient senses. Routledge.
I'm trying something new with these visualisers, let me know what you think. Should I stick with the text-to-speech voice, or should I record these myself? 💐Nuri